CLACivil Liberties
Action
All research ↗

RESEARCH / VERSION 1.1 / 16 OCTOBER 2026

Recovery at work

What support do employers put in writing?

Coverage: 30 reviewed public employer documents. A purposive pilot, not a representative survey or a guarantee of current HR practice.

Findings and their limits

What 30 public employer documents put in writing about treatment time and recovery. The sample contains 13 universities, ten NHS bodies, five councils and two other bodies; it is not representative of UK employers.

27 documents describe a treatment-time route. Seven contain express paid treatment/appointment wording; six further records expressly use sick-pay terms. Fourteen identify a route without establishing payment, and three lack an identified treatment-time provision within the examined scope. These categories describe wording, not staff experience or unconditional entitlements.

ProvisionExplicitly identifiedNot identified in scopeNot reviewed
Confidentiality3000
Voluntary help-seeking2910
Treatment time2730
Relapse / recurrence2181
Return / rehabilitation2730
Safety / impairment2910
Occupational health2820

Conditions are recorded separately. “Explicit” includes conditional provisions; “not identified” is not “never offered”. The seven express-paid passages were rechecked on 16 October; the sick-pay category is a recode of existing evidence descriptions. Other leave terms may exist outside reviewed documents.

New checks identified Hywel Dda V6 and its treatment guidance, resolved Public Health Wales’s lapse diagram and examined Salisbury’s three appendices. Policy currency and implementation remain separate questions.

Read CLA’s proposed model policy

Cite and reuse

Civil Liberties Action (2026). Recovery at work [Dataset]. Version 1.1, 2026-10-16. https://cla-political-finance.copperchime4.chatgpt.site/databases/releases/2026-10-16-v1.1/workplace-research.html

For an individual observation, cite its fixed-version record and the original source. Credit original publishers for their figures; CLA supplies the compilation, coding and stated analysis. Reuse terms.

Methods and selection

Unit of analysis

One employer and the identified policy version, with separately identified supporting documents. Seven provision dimensions; a missing statement is not evidence of absence in practice.

Inclusion and coverage

30 accessible public-sector/publicly funded employer documents: 13 universities, 10 NHS bodies, five councils and two other bodies. Purposive discovery sample; not a census or representative survey. Employer-hosted substantive text was required. Inaccessible documents, unfilled templates and unconfirmed drafts were excluded rather than coded as no policy.

Coding and checks

Selection-history limitation

The first pilots were assembled through purposive discovery and source checking. Their complete original search-engine query/results history was not retained, so the first selection cannot be replayed exactly. This limitation is not repaired by writing a retrospective systematic-search claim. Published records and transformations can be reproduced from the supplied files; prospective expansion protocols below define the next collection work.

Prospective expansion protocol

Before expanding, select a complete named employer population and record its membership and cutoff date. Search each employer's official website for alcohol, drugs, substance misuse and recovery policies, follow appendices, and log documents found, blocked, excluded and unresolved. Have a second human coder independently assess a sample before describing inter-rater reliability; repeated AI checks are not independent human review.

Interpretation limits

Written policies cannot establish implementation, staff experience, effectiveness, legal compliance or comparative employer quality. Northern Ireland policy records do not import Great Britain equality legislation.

Dates and accountability

Release date is the date of this publication. reviewed_at records a stated evidence check, not proof that every fact remains current. Publication date, event date, reference period, document version and source-check date are separate fields.

Published by Civil Liberties Action. Compilation, source retrieval and drafting used AI assistance. Automated integrity checks and additional source checks are described below; no independent external or specialist review is claimed.

Download the protocol and dictionary

Data dictionary

FieldDefinition
id / record_idStable record identifier; retained across releases where the unit remains the same.
release / versionPublication date and release version, separate from the date of underlying evidence.
record_url / citationFixed-version record link and suggested citation.
category / geography / periodDisplay group, actual coverage and source reference period; not a harmonised statistical panel.
reviewed_atDate of the recorded source check, subject to its stated scope.
details / sourcesLabelled observations and original URLs, titles and locators.
limitationsRecord-specific boundary on interpretation.
rawUnderlying typed source/coding fields; null remains missing, not zero.
provision_coding.presenceexplicit, not_identified_in_reviewed_scope or not_reviewed.
condition_statuscondition_or_scope_recorded; not_separately_assessed; not_applicable; unresolved. Not a quality score.
treatment_leave_classificationMultiple leave routes; separate pay_status, pay_note, source locator and any targeted check date.
provisions.statusLegacy coding retained; yes and conditional both indicate explicit presence.

Fixed-version records

RecordReference periodStatus
University of Dundee2023-06-01Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
University of ExeterDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Falkirk CouncilDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust2024-02-29 (version 6)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust2026-01-26Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Leeds Beckett University2019-12 (V1219)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Keele University2023-12-19 (version 1.3)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Loughborough UniversityDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Oxford Brookes University2010-11Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
University of BristolDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Louth Town Council2024-04-30Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
West Lothian Council2019-04-23Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Sharlston Parish CouncilDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Lincolnshire County CouncilDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust2025-07-15 (version 1)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2026-10-07 (version 6.0; approved 2026-08-06)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust2025-02 (version 4.0)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
University of Bath2024-05-01Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
University of St Andrews2025-06-02 (version 1.5)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
University of Glasgow2023-08Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Velindre University NHS Trust2024-09-26 (version 4, WF18)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Public Health Wales NHS Trust2022-09-06 approved; published 2022-09-12 (version 3, PHW49)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Hywel Dda University Health Board2026-05-19 approved; active 2026-09-11 (version 6, policy 283)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Aberystwyth University2019-07 last reviewed (version 1.1)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Ulster University2014-06-03 last edit; effective 2014-08-01 (version 3.1)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Probation Board for Northern Ireland2019-02-22 board approval; implemented 2019-03-01 (version 0.3)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Sport WalesDocument date not establishedPublished document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board2023-01-18 approved; published 2023-01-31 (version 4, UHB171)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Queen Margaret University2017-01 last reviewed; issued 2012-11-30Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed
Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust2021-05 (version 1.2)Published document examined; internal operation unconfirmed

Corrections, funding and interests

Send the record identifier, proposed correction and supporting primary source to policy@civillibertiesaction.org.uk. Corrections are assessed against the same evidence rules for all subjects. Responses, reversals and corrected outcomes receive the same factual prominence as initial decisions. Substantive changes require a dated new release and a change-log entry; the old files remain available.

CLA's existing funding and interests statement applies. Its founder has disclosed Labour Party membership. The same inclusion, identity and correction rules apply regardless of political affiliation. Read the declaration.